Subject: Renaming DLSw

From: [email-masked] (Dan Profant)
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 93 09:08:32 PDT

Unless IBM has trademarked DLSw then
ascom Timeplex would prefer staying with the DLSw name.

It's in place.  We all think we understand what it means.  IBM happened to be 
the first (at least to my knowledge) one off the blocks, so they got to name
it.  IBM's part of this forum and if they elect not to follow what is 
established as the extensions to the protocol, then they are no longer 
supporting DLSw.

Dan Profant
ascom Timeplex