Subject: Re: SAP List Support

From: Frank Bordonaro <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 94 13:28:01 PDT

> 
> > I would like to restate this. I think we should recognize the group bit
> > in the dsap, to cover all future possibilities. At this point, this may be
> > an overkill, so just filtering even saps is also acceptable to me. The
> > responses on the mailer should decide the issue.
> > Thanks.
> > Frank B.
> 
> As you would have guessed, 16 bytes of even SAP's is acceptable to me as well.
> 
> Also, I would like to point out that I see only three issues of significance
> that have been changed since the AIW5 discussions. (I am assuming that we will
> end up with a 16 byte SAP list, a change to that would make my list four.)
> 
> 1. NetBIOS Support CV will be removed.
> 2. SAP List Support CV is required in CAPex.
> 3. SAP List Support CV will be added to Run-Time list.
> 
> Frank and Scott, do you see any others?
> 
> Thanks,
>   Steve Petriccione: [email-masked]
>   Data Link Switch Development
>   International Business Machines Corp.
>   Research Triangle Park, NC
> 

Nope. Since AIW5, these are all the changes I am aware of.

In reference to item 3 above, I would like mention in the CapEx proposal
that any Run-time changes in the SAP Support CV should *not* affect existing
DLC-to-DLC circuits. Does anyone feel otherwise?

Frank

---

From: [email-masked] (Paul Brittain)
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 94 15:33:10 BST

> DLC-to-DLC circuits. Does anyone feel otherwise?
Fine - much better than having to locate and destroy all affected circuits.

Paul Brittain.