Subject: suggested change

From: "Peter W. Gayek" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 94 19:53:59 EDT

Wayne,
Here's a concrete wording change that implements the point I was trying
to make in my last post, i.e., that the cv isn't completely optional.
Please incorporate if you think it's accurate.

|  This control vector is required only if there are Vendor Specific
|  control vectors in the Capabilities Exchange, and is used to provide
|  the context for the Vendor Specific CVs that follow it.  If there
   are multiple instances of the Vendor Context control vector, the
   specified context remains in effect for all Vendor Specific control
   vectors until the next Vendor Context control vector is encountered.

Thanks,
Peter

---

From: Wayne Clark <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 94 14:31:06 EDT

Peter -

    The improved wording looks good to me.

    Alan -
	Do you need a submission from me or is Peter's text below adequate?

Wayne